Financial regulators’ climate mandate should be formalised

Sergio Scandizzo and Tony Hughes

Most major central banks around the world are nominally independent of their elected representatives. Financial regulators are delegated a range of important responsibilities that would normally be the purview of the legislature but which, in the past, have been seriously undermined by the competitive political process. Delegating these tasks – the aims of which are normally uncontroversial – allows them to be handled by public servants who are largely disinterested in the results of elections.

This independence is not absolute and is normally bestowed only by convention. Though it has never been fully tested, corruption or gross incompetence demonstrated by officials would force the elected representatives to suspend the independence of the bank. Though they would face an electoral backlash, we can also imagine a powerful prime minister or president acting to remove a competent central banker for purely political purposes. It goes without saying that the only recourse for a voter who is dissatisfied with the performance of the central bank would be to lobby their elected representatives to take this kind of action. As we have made clear, the independence of the financial regulator

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Want to know what’s included in our free membership? Click here

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here