Promulgating pro-cyclicality

Collaboration between financial supervisors has never been higher. But as the regulation of banks and insurance companies becomes increasingly homogenised, fears are growing about the possibility that the new rules will increase the severity of a global systemic shock. By Christopher Jeffery

pg75-gif

It's a sign of a benign market environment when respondents to a survey called Banking Banana Skins 2006, released by the Centre for the Study of Financial Innovation and PricewaterhouseCoopers in June, vote 'too much regulation' as the biggest threat to the financial health of banks for the second year in a row. These respondents from more than 60 countries believe the regulatory burden is too costly and acts as a distraction.

Financial prudential supervisors, which aim to ensure consumer

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here