EU-wide Stress Test Versus SCAP and CCAR: Region-wide and Global Perspectives
Piers Haben, Caroline Liesegang and Mario Quagliariello
Introduction
CCAR and Stress Testing as Complementary Supervisory Tools
Financial Institution Perspectives on the Evolving Role of Enterprise-wide Stress Testing
The Advancement of Stress Testing at Banks
Designing Macroeconomic Scenarios for Stress Testing
Determining the Severity of Macroeconomic Stress Scenarios
Data, Analytics and Reporting Requirements: Challenges and Solutions
A Multi-view Model Framework for Stress Testing C&I Portfolios
Stress Testing Credit Losses for Commercial Real Estate Loan Portfolios
Stress Testing and Retail Portfolios
Market and Counterparty Risk Stress Test
On Operational Risk Stress Testing
Quantitative PPNR Modelling
Banks’ Governance and Controls over Internal Capital Adequacy Processes
CCAR and Capital Management: Relationship with Economic Capital, Regulatory Capital and ICAAP
EU-wide Stress Test Versus SCAP and CCAR: Region-wide and Global Perspectives
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is required by its founding regulation to initiate and coordinate EU-wide stress tests to assess the resilience of banks to adverse market developments. The first such stress test was performed by the Committee of European Banking Supervisors (CEBS), the EBA’s predecessor, in 2009. The individual results of the stress test were kept confidential. In 2010, CEBS performed another EU-wide stress test, and this time an aggregate report as well as individual bank results were published.
Building on the experience of two previous stress tests, the newly established EBA conducted a stress test among 91 banks in 2011. This exercise was undertaken in coordination with national supervisors, the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), the European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Commission (EC). The objective of the stress test was to assess the solidity of the EU banking system and the solvency of individual institutions to stress events. The 2011 EBA stress test was a constrained bottom-up exercise. Banks were required to use their internal models for estimating possible losses, although the EBA identified common minimum methodological assumptions and
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net