Risk management consultant of the year: KPMG
Asia Risk Awards 2022
Covid-19’s impact on risk management has been far-reaching: it has disrupted regulatory timetables and forced firms to reassess their operational resilience.
Now, as the world enters the post-pandemic era, there is a lot of catching up that needs to be done. KPMG, with its deep pan-regional expertise, is proving to be the consultant of choice for many of these risk management challenges.
“Covid-19 has obviously had a huge impact [and] has generated a significant demand for our services in some very specific areas, particularly on the credit risk management side,” says Tom Jenkins, head of KPMG’s financial risk management practice in Hong Kong.
The pandemic has also forced regulators to delay implementation of some key regulations, such as the later phases of uncleared margin rules (UMR) and outstanding Basel III regulations, including the fundamental review of the trading book (FRTB).
“As regulators return to a more ‘business as usual’ outlook, we are seeing clients move into a relatively aggressive implementation mode for many of these outstanding pieces of regulation,” says Jenkins.
FRTB
Long before Covid-19 struck, KPMG was spending a lot of time helping clients get ready for FRTB but, in the absence of clear guidance from regulators, it was slow going.
Now that regulators are getting back on track, there is renewed urgency to completing this outstanding piece of Basel legislation.
KPMG currently has more than 20 FRTB implementation projects in the works across the region. Some are long-established projects, which were started before the pandemic. Others were only started recently, with a number of new clients signing up over the past few months. The majority of these projects are based in mainland China, Hong Kong and Korea. KPMG is expecting to see more work coming out of Singapore in the months ahead.
For many banks in the region, particularly those with more complex books, the switchover to FRTB is a significant undertaking.
“We’re helping with everything – from the integration of vendor solution and user-acceptance testing to the validation of pricing models and sensitivity calculations,” Jenkins says.
One of the more complex elements of FRTB implementation is deciding what should be moved over to the trading book and what can stay within the banking account.
“While this might sound relatively straightforward, many of our clients are finding the organisational implications of this challenging due to the need to realign roles and responsibilities … Introducing internal risk transfer can add further layer of complexity,” says Jenkins.
KPMG’s support of the FRTB transition extends beyond just helping clients navigate the process. The consultant has sought to influence how the framework has taken shape in the region.
“Given the number of projects we are doing, we have been able to condense all the industry issues down and discuss these with regulators and industry associations,” says Jenkins.
Operational resilience
The other piece of work that has kept KPMG busy over the past 12 months has been helping financial institutions across the region update and refine their operational resilience programmes. This has become particularly important as market volatility and business disruption has highlighted shortcomings in current business practices.
“Many institutions are moving from a tactical regulatory change approach to more of a strategic lens with a focus on modernisation, and really trying to optimise what the risk function is doing,” says Craig Davis, a partner at KPMG’s practice in Australia. “These organisations want to go beyond the regulatory view of financial resilience to get a much more holistic understanding of their balance sheet and how their business is being run.”
One large project that KPMG recently undertook was for the Hong Kong subsidiary of a mainland Chinese bank, which, spooked by events during the Covid-19 pandemic, decided that an overhaul of its operational resilience framework was in order.
“We have been helping them decide what their tolerance level should be for business disruptions, how to most effectively manage their end-to-end operational processes and what comprehensive scenario stress tests they should be conducting,” says Gemini Yang, a partner at KPMG China.
Like many of the institutions that KPMG is working with, this particular firm had not updated its business continuity programme or operational risk management framework for a number of years.
The project is divided into two parts. The planning phase will last until the middle of 2023, while the implementation phase will last a further two-to-three years.
This is only one example of how KPMG is helping financial institutions update and improve their resilience framework across the region. There are plenty of others.
“Our clients’ risk management functions are increasingly essential to build and secure stakeholder trust. Our consulting model – focused on developing transformative solutions that seamlessly integrate front to middle and back office with the right mix of operating model, process, technology and people – is well-placed to help them,” says Yang.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Awards
Clearing house of the year: LCH
Risk Awards 2025: LCH outshines rivals in its commitment to innovation and co-operation with clearing members
Best use of machine learning/AI: CompatibL
CompatibL’s groundbreaking use of LLMs for automated trade entry earned the Best use of machine learning/AI award at the 2025 Risk Markets Technology Awards, redefining speed and reliability in what-if analytics
Markets Technology Awards 2025 winners’ review
Vendors jockeying for position in this year’s MTAs, as banks and regulators take aim at counterparty blind spots
Equity derivatives house of the year: Bank of America
Risk Awards 2025: Bank gains plaudits – and profits – with enhanced product range, including new variants of short-vol structures and equity dispersion
Law firm of the year: Linklaters
Risk Awards 2025: Law firm’s work helped buttress markets for credit derivatives, clearing and digital assets
Derivatives house of the year: UBS
Risk Awards 2025: Mega-merger expected to add $1 billion to markets revenues, via 30 integration projects
Interest rate derivatives house of the year: JP Morgan
Risk Awards 2025: Steepener hedges and Spire novations helped clients navigate shifting rates regime
Currency derivatives house of the year: UBS
Risk Awards 2025: Access to wealth management client base helped Swiss bank to recycle volatility and provide accurate pricing for a range of FX structures