PRA could be more flexible on matching adjustment collateral

The PRA’s rigid view on posting collateral from matching adjustment portfolios is mistaken, says Simeon Rudin of Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, forcing firms to repaper trades with no tangible benefit for policyholders

matching-doors

The position of the UK regulator on managing collateral in matching adjustment (MA) portfolios is at risk of adding to firms’ costs without enhancing the security of policyholders.

The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) set out requirements for derivatives and collateral within a Solvency II matching adjustment (MA) portfolio in a March 28 letter, making clear that derivatives relating to assets held partly in MA portfolios and partly outside will have to be split.

The PRA also said

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here