Botched legal work in BT privatisation responsible for potential £23 billion pension liability for UK taxpayers

Flawed legal agreement behind landmark UK privatisation leaves UK taxpayers counting the cost

bt-centre

A failure to define what was meant by the term ‘liability' by lawyers constructing the agreement for the UK government's 1984 privatisation of telecoms group BT is the reason why the UK taxpayer has been left with a potential £23 billion bill following last week's high court ruling.

In order to protect the pensions of employees, the government gave a guarantee that it would stand behind BT's pension obligations, and the scheme's trustees sought to clarify whether this covered all the obligations

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here