French banks, jump-to-default and STS for synthetics
The week on Risk.net, October 26–November 1, 2019
French banks cry foul over EBA’s 2020 stress-test plan
Assumptions about the cost of household sight deposits are “not plausible”, critics say
LCH to cut jump-to-default margin for cleared CDS
Move could bring margin for cleared CDS closer to bilateral trades, but mismatch remains
Structural snags frustrate STS for synthetics
Curbs on excess spread and collateral stymie route to ‘high-quality’ signifier
COMMENTARY: Strength in numbers
Banks in France are pushing back against a one-size-fits-all policy imposed by their European regulator. In its stress-test methodology, the European Banking Authority measures banks against a funding shock to consumer deposits caused by an increase in interest rates – when in fact such deposits in France pay no interest.
The nub of the matter goes back to a 2004 European Court of Justice case. The court found preventing interest payments to retail depositors impedes free movement of capital within Europe’s single market. At the time, the judgement – repudiating a 1986 French regulation – allowed challenger banks to start paying interest on deposits. Established banks in the country, however, continue to shun the practice.
But because of the ECJ case, French banks cannot claim that zero interest rates are imposed by law, and cannot therefore take advantage of an EBA carve-out for deposits operating under such restrictions.
Sources say the EBA is unlikely to change tack, but that will not silence calls for the regulator to be more flexible in its approach to stress-testing the continent’s banks.
Enforcing the same shock on all banks without distinguishing between products and organisations “doesn’t work”, a stress-testing manager tells Risk.net, adding that a lobbying effort against the measure is likely.
Elsewhere, collective action is also brewing to tackle the costs associated with model development and validation for stress tests. A group of banks has been incentivised to team up and create a utility that pools data and methodologies necessary for these regulatory examinations.
Banks fork out not insignificant sums to develop proprietary models for stress-testing. The resulting data hardly represents drivers of competitive differentiation for them. Therefore, it should be possible to share the uniform underlying calculations in a standardised format.
The initiative is a promising development for banks. They may need to seek the blessing of the European Central Bank, but it has previously endorsed a similar idea for pooling techniques to model credit risk capital requirements.
STAT OF THE WEEK
HSBC swallowed a $883 million charge to cover future expected credit losses in the third quarter of this year, some of which was in response to the protests rocking Hong Kong – turmoil pushes HSBC’s credit loss charge higher.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“There’s a certain cost associated with having a trading operation. Within a best execution setting, you need to continuously improve, and those improvements might lead to cost reduction, but also might lead to an increase in cost because you need new technology, different technology, more people, different insights, other ways of trading that are more costly but better for your client” – Jan Mark van Mill, head of treasury and trading at APG Asset Management.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on 7 days in 60 seconds
Bank capital, margining and the return of FX
The week on Risk.net, December 12–18
Hedge fund losses, CLS and a capital floor
The week on Risk.net, December 5–11
Capital buffers, contingent hedges and USD Libor
The week on Risk.net, November 28–December 4
SA-CCR, SOFR lending and model approval
The week on Risk.net, November 21-27, 2020
Fallbacks, Libor and the cultural risks of lockdown
The week on Risk.net, November 14-20, 2020
Climate risk, fixing Libor and tough times for US G-Sibs
The week on Risk.net, November 7-13, 2020
FVA pain, ethical hedging and a degraded copy of Trace
The week on Risk.net, October 31–November 6, 2020
Basis traders, prime brokers and election risk
The week on Risk.net, October 24-30, 2020