Outsourcers, IM delay and machine learning
The week on Risk.net, May 25–31, 2019
Outsourcers eye bigger role in funds’ fixed income trading
Research suggests 20% of large asset managers will outsource part of overall trading by 2022
Talk of delaying IM ‘big bang’ sparks backlash
EC official’s recent comments may hamper compliance preparations, dealers say
JP Morgan turns to machine learning for options hedging
New models sidestep Black-Scholes and could slash hedging costs for some derivatives by up to 80%
COMMENTARY: Clearing, the final hurdle
Banks and clearing houses have pushed back at suggestions – from a senior European Commission official – that the final phase of rules for non-cleared margin could be put off.
The reaction follows suggestions by Patrick Pearson, who heads the EC’s financial market infrastructure and derivatives unit, at a Risk.net conference in London on May 14. Pearson urged the industry to “keep banging the drum” for a delay.
But dealers and clearing houses tell Risk.net the thought of a delay – “dragging out the pain” – is not appealing. They say the industry has had plenty of time to prepare for the incoming requirements, unveiled more than a decade ago as part of the Group of 20’s post-crisis reforms.
Global non-cleared margin rules require over-the-counter derivatives counterparties to post initial margin against bilateral trades when outstanding notional breaches a certain threshold. When, in September 2020, that threshold drops to $8 billion, phase five – the ‘IM big bang’ – will capture hundreds of buy-side firms.
Indeed, at large dealers, the rules already mandate the posting of initial margin and are having a big effect on notional amounts of cleared derivatives outstanding. In March, for example, Risk.net reported that cleared notionals across the eight US global systemically important banks climbed by $6.9 trillion (8%) in 2018.
It is likely that the non-cleared margin rules that came into force for around 20 firms in September 2018 expanded the pool of counterparties – on top of the 40 already captured in prior years – with which bilateral trades have become more costly.
What is also being observed is that the bilateral derivatives portfolios of those banks are attracting heftier risk weightings under capital rules today than they did in 2015 – although they are much smaller.
Cleared notional growth is expected to continue to outpace that for non-cleared trades, as the rollout of the rules encourages banks to replace expired client trades with cleared iterations to avoid onerous margin and operational costs.
STAT OF THE WEEK
Taking the financial crisis out of the lookback window has turned the risk profile of Morningstar’s fund ratings on their head. With the financial crisis in the lookback window, half of the funds with the highest 10-year ratings also had low betas in the bottom 20% of all funds. Now, over 90% of top-rated funds have betas greater than one, meaning they are theoretically more volatile than the market.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“I always say banks don’t manage financial crime; they manage the regulatory risk associated with financial crime” – Richard Carrick, regional head of financial crime assurance for the Asia-Pacific region at Barclays.
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on 7 days in 60 seconds
Bank capital, margining and the return of FX
The week on Risk.net, December 12–18
Hedge fund losses, CLS and a capital floor
The week on Risk.net, December 5–11
Capital buffers, contingent hedges and USD Libor
The week on Risk.net, November 28–December 4
SA-CCR, SOFR lending and model approval
The week on Risk.net, November 21-27, 2020
Fallbacks, Libor and the cultural risks of lockdown
The week on Risk.net, November 14-20, 2020
Climate risk, fixing Libor and tough times for US G-Sibs
The week on Risk.net, November 7-13, 2020
FVA pain, ethical hedging and a degraded copy of Trace
The week on Risk.net, October 31–November 6, 2020
Basis traders, prime brokers and election risk
The week on Risk.net, October 24-30, 2020