FRTB, modelling and the survival of voice broking
European FRTB capital charges hang by a thread
EU Council mulls introducing only reporting requirements in CRR II, or a very low scalar
Tullett Prebon and the mystery Clob
How tpSef quietly kept voice broking alive in a regime designed for e-trading
CCAR gives op risk modelling a new lease of life
OpRisk North America: Fed’s annual stress tests are rehabilitating ‘black box’ op risk modelling
COMMENTARY: The view from New York
Technological threats topped the agenda at the 20th Operational Risk North America conference, with calls for a revised Patriot Act in the US to make cyber defence and information sharing easier, and warnings that visions of precise cyber modelling were nothing but ‘a pipedream’ and should be sacrificed in favour of accuracy. There were also warnings of the danger of proliferating internet-enabled devices – the so-called internet of things – which could vastly expand the scope of denial-of-service attacks, as well as endangering cyber security in a variety of more subtle ways.
Operational risk modelling also drew attention, and the message here was more positive than it has been in previous years. The annual US Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review is giving op risk modelling a new lease of life, bank op risk experts told the conference, and international inconsistencies in Pillar 1 capital levels could be ironed out by the incoming Standardised Measurement Approach.
STAT OF THE WEEK
Nearly 19GW of clean power has been purchased via corporate power purchase agreements since 2008, with 76% of these deals happening since 2015.
QUOTE OF THE WEEK
“There is a real need to either evolve the information-sharing process under the FS-ISAC or modernise 314(b) sharing [in the Patriot Act] to include personally identifying information alongside cyber threats. I personally don’t care which one gets modernised, but it has to happen otherwise we are just going to keep continuing to be owned by the bad guys” – Kelley Chamberlain, Wells Fargo
Further reading
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on 7 days in 60 seconds
Bank capital, margining and the return of FX
The week on Risk.net, December 12–18
Hedge fund losses, CLS and a capital floor
The week on Risk.net, December 5–11
Capital buffers, contingent hedges and USD Libor
The week on Risk.net, November 28–December 4
SA-CCR, SOFR lending and model approval
The week on Risk.net, November 21-27, 2020
Fallbacks, Libor and the cultural risks of lockdown
The week on Risk.net, November 14-20, 2020
Climate risk, fixing Libor and tough times for US G-Sibs
The week on Risk.net, November 7-13, 2020
FVA pain, ethical hedging and a degraded copy of Trace
The week on Risk.net, October 31–November 6, 2020
Basis traders, prime brokers and election risk
The week on Risk.net, October 24-30, 2020