Banks bemoan data gap in Mifid II systematic internaliser test

EU-wide data is needed before banks can determine their market share under a key 'systematic internaliser' rule in Mifid II

question-mark-and-maze
Path unknown: some dealers say electing to become an SI is generally more hassle than it's worth

Dealers are complaining it is impossible to work out which products they trade bilaterally will be subject to controversial transparency requirements in 16 months' time. A lack of data is leaving them unable to prepare for the rule and calculate corresponding cost increases for end-users, they say.

If a bank reaches a certain market share threshold for a product as set out in the second Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid II), it becomes a so-called systematic internaliser (SI)

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here