![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Wash trades 'not bribes', Hayes says at Libor trial
Alleged Libor manipulator Tom Hayes argues that his 2008–09 wash trades were aimed at maintaining a good relationship between UBS and its brokers, denying that they were bribes
![ubs ubs](/sites/default/files/styles/landscape_750_463/public/import/IMG/022/168022/ubs-sign-580x358.jpg.webp?itok=zQBOQ8OA)
Tom Hayes, the ex-UBS trader on trial in London for his alleged role in the Libor-rigging scandal, told the court today (July 9) that the wash trades he put on were aimed at preserving valuable relationships with brokers, rather than rewarding them for their help in pushing Libor higher or lower in his favour.
Earlier in the trial, the prosecution said Hayes would arrange with friendly brokers to put on two opposing trades at the same price point simultaneously – a tactic known as wash trades. The trades would have no effect on profit and loss for UBS, but served purely as a way to channel additional brokerage fees to the broker, the prosecution argued.
Hayes faces eight charges of conspiracy to defraud, to all of which he has pleaded not guilty.
Libor trial: latest updates
Day-by-day coverage of Tom Hayes Libor trial
Hayes denied the trades were bribes. "I would say that a bribe is for doing something that you would not otherwise do – and I had been going to them for help with Libor for 18 months before the first wash trade took place," he said. Instead, Hayes argued, the trades were a way of continuing to provide income for the brokers in the absence of interbank liquidity after the collapse of Lehman Brothers.
"You can always do a trade at any price, but doing a deal like that would have cost UBS a horrendous amount in bid-offer spread," he said. "I was trying to find the cheapest way for UBS to pay brokerage."
The inference that "this was just for their help with Libor" was wrong, he said. "Brokers have a lot of power, they decide who gets the good deals ... what we call the gift deals – they will choose their most profitable clients."
Hayes also downplayed his own ability to influence UBS's Libor submissions, saying that for much of the time "I had very limited control over what UBS would submit". Fellow trader Roger Darin was in charge of submissions, and "he and I didn't see eye to eye", Hayes added. This limited his ability to deliver on agreements with other traders, such as RBS's Guillaume Adolph, to move submissions in each other's favour, he said.
The trial continues.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…