Disclosure of Solvency II's long-term measures benefit risks ‘misinterpretation’

Dual-reporting could confuse investors and undermine confidence in the LTG package, say experts

raining-documents

Insurers have warned that rules mandating public disclosure of the capital benefits of using Solvency II's long-term guarantee (LTG) measures could undermine the legitimacy of these parts of the directive and increase reporting costs.

As part of the agreement on Omnibus II negotiated last Wednesday, insurers taking advantage of tools such as the volatility adjuster and matching adjustment will be made to produce one regulatory report that includes the capital benefit of the measures, and one

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

The future of life insurance

As the world constantly evolves and changes, so too does the life insurance industry, which is preparing for a multitude of challenges, particularly in three areas: interest rates, regulatory mandates and technology (software, underwriting tools and…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here