Euroclear and Clearstream granted time to agree joint road map
Both ICSDs intend to start a feasibility assessment for real-time settlement after the completion of Target2-Securities migration in June 2017
Euroclear and Clearstream have been granted more time by the International Capital Market Association's European Repo Council (Icma ERC) to come up with plans to improve Bridge, an electronic communications platform through which customer transactions are settled.
In March, Icma ERC wrote to Clearstream and Euroclear complaining of its "significant disappointment" regarding progress to establish tri-party settlement interoperability between the two international central securities depositories (ICSDs), Icma ERC and Eurex Clearing.
At that time, Icma ERC sought a clear written commitment to deliver an appropriate development plan before the ERC held its annual general meeting in Brussels on May 18. At that meeting, the ERC's chair Godfried De Vidts had intended – if no further progress could be reported by the ICSDs in the matter – to refer the issue to the European Commission (EC), asking it to intervene.
De Vidts believes the EC could, after the European Securities and Markets Authority provides its Level 2 technical standards and when the Central Securities Depository Regulation (CSDR) becomes effective at the end of 2017, require all settlement in both central and commercial bank money to be real time, or as close as possible to real time, for example with a maximum of two minutes to exchange files.
But the ICSDs have now asked for an extension of deadline to May 29 in order to further develop their proposal to introduce a phased introduction. They hope then to present a joint road map that would meet the needs of the market while taking into account the constraints imposed by the regulatory agenda.
As part of the road map, the ICSDs have proposed no change to the agreed scope in Phase 1 planned for implementation in September 2015; turnaround times would be reduced to 35-90 minutes and later Bridge input deadlines would be instigated.
Phase 2, in Q1 2017, would involve "substantial improvements leveraging current Bridge architecture". Previous discussions have scoped two options in this regard. The first would achieve maximum turnaround of 26 minutes as from Q1 2017, with no scope for any further enhancement based upon this current infrastructure. The second would create new infrastructure to achieve turnaround times of between 9 and 34 minutes – 21 minutes average – by end 2017, with the scope for subsequent incremental improvements to be achieved.
In Phase 3, both ICSDs will start a feasibility assessment for real-time settlement after the completion of Target2 Securities (T2S) migration in June 2017.
The ICSDs have voiced a caveat that they need to complete certain additional IT validations internally and bilaterally before confirming this road map is sustainable.
Icma ERC believes that benefits of collateral flows following from T2S will not be felt by private investors unless the settlement bridge between the two major ICSDs is upgraded.
Euroclear declined to respond and Clearstream did not respond by press time, but a source close to the issue noted, with regard to the EC requiring settlement to be a maximum of two minutes, that CSDR does not contain a required settlement frequency and, as such, the EC would have to amend CSDR, which from a legislative standpoint is closed.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Settlement risk
Margin settlement risk and its effect on CVA
Sponsored feature: CompatibL
CLS to replace core settlement system
Overhaul will leverage conventional technology rather than blockchain solution that underpins new CLSNet service
Netting no problem for blockchain, tech firms tell regulators
Firms say DLT can sit with current market practice, but instantaneous settlement 'not desirable'
Distributed ledger innovators imagine a world without CSDs
CSDs counter they fulfil functions blockchain cannot, and regulatory changes are needed to disintermediate them
Banks eye Traiana for EM forex netting service
Industry turns to utility as CLS emerging markets push stalls
CLS facing obstacles adding RMB to its platform
RMB volumes set for growth but settlement remains an issue
FX clearing a priority for 2014, vows CLS chief
Working with banks and CCPs to facilitate central clearing of OTC forex options is 'high priority strategic initiative' for CLS this year, says chief executive David Puth
Sefs cause two-tier market as Asia OTC liquidity splits
Divide and rule