BBA and BoE aware of banks submitting false rates – Libor trial

Evidence from the Libor trial reveals concerns by bankers as early as 2005 that rates were being fiddled. BBA’s response was to encourage banks to stop being dishonest

Bank of England
Bank of England: knew about Libor flaws

Senior members of the trade association controlling Libor were aware the rate was being abused as early as 2005, the court heard today (June 5) in the trial of former UBS and Citigroup trader Tom Hayes.

Hayes is accused of eight counts of conspiracy to defraud from alleged manipulation of the London interbank offered rate (Libor), which is linked to trillions of dollars of financial products.

Senior bankers from the banks involved in setting Libor were interviewed annually by the British Bankers' Association (BBA) to monitor the sometimes controversial benchmark and gather industry views on how to improve it.

 

"There is consensus amongst banks that sterling Libor and US dollar are being set 3–4 basis points above the true cash rate," John Ewan, in charge of Libor at the BBA between 2006 and 2010, wrote in a summary to one such report from 2005.

Libor depends on a panel of banks submitting their view of the cost of borrowing funds from another bank by 11am each working day.

The prosecution alleges Hayes and other traders encouraged Libor setters to fix the rate at a number that would help them make money from their trading positions, rather than setting it based on the actual cash rate in the market.

"This is a major problem and must be fixed," was the view of one Credit Suisse representative.

The representative from HBOS was quoted as saying: "Some companies will quote rates to suit their current position. It has always been the way."

The court heard similar comments from later reviews up to the period of the financial crisis in 2007 and 2008.

"It's a bloody mess and most certainly not a science," wrote one HSBC representative in 2007.

Ewan and Sally Scutt, deputy chief executive of the BBA during the period in question, both acknowledged that issues of banks altering Libor from the cash value were well understood within the organisation.

"We would hear repeated allegations that were never actual smoking guns," Ewan told the court.

The court was also shown emails from Michael Cross, Bank of England head of the sterling markets division and head of market intelligence, sent in June 2008, demonstrating the UK's central bank was aware of problems with Libor.

"Amongst many market participants there has long been concern expressed about whether Libor can be manipulated," Cross wrote in an email to Alex Merriman, at the time executive director of the BBA's wholesale and financial market infrastructure teams.

Despite the widespread knowledge of problems with Libor manipulation, no major changes were made to the process of setting the benchmark.

Ewan said the BBA's strategy to deal with the potential rate manipulation was to write "regularly to the committee banks reminding them of the definition" and for BBA chief executive at the time, Angela Knight, to "urge [panel banks] to ensure the rates were accurate".

He said more drastic measures, including changing the definition of how the benchmark was calculated, were discussed but not pursued because of the potential damage caused to long-term financial products linked to Libor.

The trial continues.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Financial crime and compliance50 2024

The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector

Investment banks: the future of risk control

This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control

Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective

Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…

Emerging trends in op risk

Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…

Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk

How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here