Banks short of op risk experts and analysis
Investment banks are short on staff and are too focused on data collection, says a new BCS survey
LONDON – Investment banks are failing to fill op risk personnel requirements. There is a lack of expertise on staff, too much focus on day-to-day data collection and too little on data analysis, according to new research from operational consultant and software provider BCS.
The research – which focused on op risk and control within operations divisions – showed 65% of participants had not filled their op risk staff requirements. The staffing shortfall is exacerbated by labour-intensive, manual data collection and incident reporting, with inadequate investment in the mechanics of op risk and control processes.
“There’s an acceptance that people want to get from collection and reporting towards analysis and being proactive. People are so busy collecting data, collecting incidents and getting monthly reports out one way or another that they are less able to act pre-emptively,” says Jennifer Moodie, head of operational risk at BCS.
The least important priority was said to be governance – most firms claiming to have already implemented the structures upon which their risk reporting is founded.
"Everybody across the survey felt they did have their governance, structure and reporting very much in place, which wouldn’t have been the case if you’d asked that question three or four years ago,” says Moodie.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements