Merrill and Bank of America deal sparks lawsuits
NEW YORK - Within minutes of the September 15 announcement of the demise of Lehman Brothers, rival Merrill Lynch revealed its sale to fellow investment giant Bank of America in a $50 billion deal.
The deal, which will be worked out in the early part of 2009, will see Bank of America pay around $29 for each Merrill share - up on September prices of under $5 but down from more than $90 in early 2007. Merrill's sale, though not forced in the style of March's Bear Stearns near-collapse, is similarly shocking.
Merrill has been one of the greatest losers among the banks as a result of subprime debts. It has written off more than $40 billion of assets over the past twelve months. How long the US's largest brokerage and fourth largest investment bank could have struggled on independently is unknown, although by sailing its sinking hull into a safe harbour it has avoided a Lehman-style collapse.
The new group would be the largest brokerage house in the world.
The combined underwriting power of the two banks ought to leave Bank of America in a commanding position across US and global equity and debt capital markets. But however well the two complement one another, a merger would make large-scale job losses on Merrill's side unavoidable.
The sale requires approval by US regulators - who are likely to push the deal through in the interests of financial stability - and shareholders - who may pose more of a problem. Merrill shareholders have already filed lawsuits against the bank's chief executive John Thain and the company's board of directors, claiming the terms of the deal are unfair.
One suit was filed by law firm Murray, Frank & Sailer in the New York State Supreme Court on September 15 on behalf of shareholder Peter Miller and a class of investors. It claims the $50 billion offered by Bank of America is insufficient, and that Merrill is being undervalued against its interests.
On the same day, law firm Wold Haldenstein & Herz said it would launch its own investor lawsuit against Merrill and Bank of America. The company claims that Thain and the Merrill board possess undisclosed financial information on Merrill's investments that they have not disclosed to shareholders.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy
EU banks fear loss of NSFR repo relief
European Commission must decide by next June; other jurisdictions adopted softer calibration
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition